Letter to David Burrowes MP, 5th October 2011
Dear Mr Burrowes,Because of your previous false claims re correspondence, we are deeply suspicious when you thank us (letter 3/10/2011) for sending you a copy of our letter as sent to the Home Office dated 28th Sept 2011. We did not send you a copy of this letter? You appear to be up to your old tricks again, trying to indicate that we are ‘in touch’.
We are reminded how puzzled we were by your false claim that we had contacted you, as indicated in your letter (27/7/2009), when you wrote quite falsely,
“Thank you for your letter 13th July 2009 in response to mine of the 6th July 2009. Please let me know if you require further assistance…”
We saw this ‘manufacturing’ of correspondence as being just for your files, as some kind of political skulduggery. We had never received a letter from you dated the 6th July 2009 – so we would not have replied to it on the 13th July 2009 as you have suggested? How we ask in the name of god could you have received an answer from us when we did not write one? (Did we sign this letter? We asked for a copy of it trying to establish whether it was a forgery – nothing seems sacrosanct any more?)
We saw this dodgy invention as pure chicanery, something that was particularly important to you. Because we had kept up a ‘high profile’ re our case, people would have the impression that you as our MP were connected to us, hence the ‘manufactured’ correspondence between us.
This scandalous appendage to our struggle forced us to write to you, as a matter of urgency asking for a copy of our ‘ghost’ letter supposedly written to you on the 13th July 2009. No copy was sent to us – there was no reply from you as our MP.
This ‘unwritten letter’ that you claimed to have received from us was flagrant duplicity. It left us wondering what sort of chicanery was going on here.
The idea that you can fabricate/manufacture ‘evidence’ as you see fit, is somewhat startling – you should stop creating ‘porkies’ in the attempt to give the impression that you are somehow in touch with, and representing us – you are not - you are just a little too self-serving.
However, because of your neglect re our case we wrote to you, letter dated June 3rd 2011, carrying various criticisms, how we felt you should have shown more concern re the fraudulent acts against us, like government lawyers abuse of the rule of law in our case. This critical letter of ours points to the poor relationship between us, something you seem to want to hide.
In order to put a stop to this nonsense whereby you wrongly give the impression through ‘ghost correspondence’ that you are somehow ‘in touch’, forces us to send our criticisms of you (3/6/2011) to all and sundry. We feel its time we stopped being pawns in your political duplicity, your cop-outs, neglect and deceits.
We ask, as per our studies re public sector corruption, is this a common Westminster ‘wheeze’ where MPs send their constituents duplicitous letters, trying to convince Parliament that they are in touch with their ‘put upon’ constituents?
There seems to be no amount of sin, no amount of deceit that cannot be conjured up by MPs and public sector officials – much like the rioters, the law-abiding electorate also feels like erupting at the blatant contempt shown them by MPs in general.
MPs deem their political spin is suitable for all occasions, and have for too long expected citizens to be deferential and uncomplaining to those who corrupt their office.
Anarchy against democratic government is more prolific in Westminster than on our streets – this infestation within Parliament causes much public anger. However, no more can MPs or officials abuse the electorate with impunity.
Please in the name of transparency and the promotion of honest representation, will you please send to us a copy of our ‘ghost’ letter that you claim we sent you on the 13th July 2009? We again ask was it a forgery?
It is now over 2 years since we first asked for a copy of this invented ‘cop-out letter’ that we were supposed to have sent you. Why have you never replied!
Seeing that you are never going to find ‘our ghost letter’ that was never sent, I await your reasons for inventing this highly incriminating piece of Westminster skulduggery.
Yours sincerely
AW & I Tanner
Enc. (1) cc to PM, dep. PM and Ministers and media etc plus letter 3/6/2011 to those interest and highly annoyed by political skulduggery that leads to disaffection re politics altogether.